ABSTRACT
Objective The COVID-19 pandemic dramatically altered social determinants of health including work, education, social connections, movement, and perceived control;and loneliness was commonly experienced. This longitudinal study examined how social determinants at the personal (micro), community (meso), and societal (macro) levels predicted loneliness during the pandemic. Methods Participants were 2056 Australian adults surveyed up to three times over 18 months in 2020 and 2021. Multi-level mixed-effect regressions were conducted predicting loneliness from social determinants at baseline and two follow-ups. Results Loneliness was associated with numerous micro determinants: male gender, lifetime diagnosis of a mental health disorder, experience of recent stressful event(s), low income, living alone or couples with children, living in housing with low natural light, noise, and major building defects. Lower resilience and perceived control over health and life were also associated with greater loneliness. At the meso level, reduced engagement with social groups, living in inner regional areas, and living in neighbourhoods with low levels of belongingness and collective resilience was associated with increased loneliness. At the macro level, increased loneliness was associated with State/Territory of residence. Conclusions Therapeutic initiatives must go beyond psychological intervention, and must recognise the social determinants of loneliness at the meso and macro levels. Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Australian Association for Cognitive and Behaviour Therapy.
ABSTRACT
A longstanding area of disagreement among theological educators has been whether the holistic formational goals of theological education can be adequately addressed through non–face-to-face learning modes. This study explored student perceptions of how their experience of studying theology in an asynchronous online context contributed to their holistic formation. Student participants were enrolled in one or more of 22 new online units of study which were developed and offered over three cycles as part of larger design-based research project. The study, initiated and conducted prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, found a broad range of design elements contributed to five dimensions of student formation (theological understanding, personal dispositions, ministry dispositions, ministry skills, identity), suggesting that purposeful learning design can facilitate holistic student formation in online and distance learning contexts. Although this study examined learning design for holistic student formation in theological courses, the results may be of interest for other disciplines with similar holistic formational aims. © 2023 Open and Distance Learning Association of Australia, Inc.
ABSTRACT
Background: The Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant is highly transmissible and escapes vaccinal immunity. Evidence is lacking as to the impact of Omicron in oncological patients. Method(s): Capitalizing on OnCovid study data (NCT04393974), we analysed COVID-19 morbidity and case fatality rate at 28 days (CFR28) of unvaccinated patients across 3 phases defined following the evolution of the pandemic in Europe, according to date of COVID-19 diagnosis: "Pre-vaccination" phase (27/02/2020-30/11/2020), "Alpha- Delta variant" phase (01/12/2020-14/12/2021), "Omicron variant" phase (15/12/2021-31/01/2022). Finding(s): By the data lock of 04/02/2022, 3820 patients from 37 institutions across 6 countries were entered. Out of 3473 eligible patients, 2033 (58.6%), 1075 (30.9%) and 365 (10.5%) were diagnosed during the Pre-vaccination, Alpha-Delta and Omicron phases. In total 659 (61.3%) and 42 (11.5%) were unvaccinated in the Alpha-Delta and Omicron. Unvaccinated patients across the Omicron, Alpha-Delta and Pre-vaccination phases experienced similar CFR28 (27.5%, 28%, 29%, respectively). Following propensity score matching, 42 unvaccinated Omicron patients were matched with 122 and 121 patients from the Pre-vaccination and Alpha-Delta phases respectively, based on country of origin, sex, age, comorbidity burden, primary tumour, cancer stage and status, and the receipt of systemic anticancer therapy at COVID-19. Unvaccinated Omicron patients experienced improved COVID-19 outcomes in comparison to patients diagnosed during the Prevaccination phase. Morbidity and mortality were comparable to those of unvaccinated patients diagnosed during the Alpha-Delta phase. Interpretation(s): Despite time-dependent improvements in outcomes reported in the Omicron phase, patients with cancer remain highly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 in absence of vaccinal protection. This study provides unequivocal evidence in support of universal vaccination of patients with cancer as a protective measure against morbidity and mortality from COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Background: Immunogenicity and safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been widely investigated in patients (pts) with cancer. However, their effectiveness against Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the additional protective effect of a booster dose in this population are yet to be defined. Methods: Using OnCovid study data (NCT04393974), a European registry enrolling consecutive pts with cancer and COVID-19, we evaluated morbidity and 14 days case fatality rates (CFR14) from COVID-19 in pts who were unvaccinated, vaccinated (either partially/full vaccinated but not boosted) and those who had received a third dose. Analyses were restricted to pts diagnosed between 17/11/2021 (first breakthrough infection in a boosted pt) and the 31/01/2022. Pts with unknown vaccination status were excluded. Results: By the data lock of 22/02/2022, out of 3820 consecutive pts from 36 institutions, 415 pts from 3 countries (UK, Spain, Italy) were eligible for analysis. Among them, 51 (12.3%) were unvaccinated, 178 (42.9%) were vaccinated and 186 (44.8%) were boosted. Among vaccinated pts, 26 (14.6%) were partially vaccinated (1 dose). Pts with haematological malignancies had more likely received a booster dose prior to infection (25.4% vs 13.6% and 11.8%, p = 0.02). We found no other associations between vaccination status and pts' characteristics including sex, age, comorbidities, smoking history, tumour stage, tumour status and receipt of systemic anticancer therapy. Compared to unvaccinated pts, boosted and vaccinated pts achieved improved CFR14 (6.8% and 7.0% vs 22.4%, p = 0.01), COVID-19-related hospitalization rates (26.1% and 20.6% vs 41.2%, p = 0.01) and COVID-19-related complications rates (14.5% and 15.7% vs 31.4%). Using multivariable Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) models adjusted for sex, comorbidities, tumour status and country of origin we confirmed that boosted (OR 0.21, 95%CI: 0.05-0.89) and vaccinated pts (OR 0.19, 95%CI: 0.04-0.81) achieved improved CFR14 compared to unvaccinated pts, whilst a significantly reduced risk of COVID-19 complications (OR 0.26, 95%CI: 0.07-0.93) was reported for vaccinated pts only. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines protect from COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in pts with cancer. Accounting for the enrichment of haematologic pts in the boosted group, the observation of comparable mortality outcomes between boosted and vaccinated pts is reassuring and suggests boosting to be associated with reduced mortality in more vulnerable subjects, despite evidence of adverse features in this group.
ABSTRACT
We sought to determine parameters of the acute phase response, a feature of innate immunity activated by infectious noxae and cancer, deranged by Covid-19 and establish oncological indices' prognostic potential for patients with concomitant cancer and Covid-19. Between 27/02 and 23/06/2020, OnCovid retrospectively accrued 1,318 consecutive referrals of patients with cancer and Covid-19 aged 18 from the U.K., Spain, Italy, Belgium, and Germany. Patients with myeloma, leukemia, or insufficient data were excluded. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), and prognostic index (PI) were evaluated for their prognostic potential, with the NLR, PLR, and PNI risk stratifications dichotomized around median values and the pre-established risk categorizations from literature utilized for the mGPS and PI. 1,071 eligible patients were randomly assorted into a training set (TS, n=529) and validation set (VS, n=542) matched for age (67.9±13.3 TS, 68.5±13.5 VS), presence of 1 comorbidity (52.1% TS, 49.8% VS), development of 1 Covid-19 complication (27% TS, 25.9% VS), and active malignancy at Covid-19 diagnosis (66.7% TS, 61.6% VS). Among all 1,071 patients, deceased patients tended to categorize into poor risk groups for the NLR, PNI, mGPS, and PI (P<0.0001) with a return to pre-Covid-19 diagnosis NLR, PNI, and mGPS categorizations following recovery (P<0.01). In the TS, higher mortality rates were associated with NLR>6 (44.6% vs 28%, P<0.0001), PNI<40 (46.6% vs 20.9%, P<0.0001), mGPS (50.6% for mGPS2 vs 30.4% and 11.4% for mGPS1 and 0, P<0.0001), and PI (50% for PI2 vs 40% for PI1 and 9.1% for PI0, P<0.0001). Findings were confirmed in the VS (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Patients in poor risk categories had shorter median overall survival [OS], (NLR>6 30 days 95%CI 1-63, PNI<40 23 days 95%CI 10-35, mGPS2 20 days 95%CI 8-32, PI2 23 days 95%CI 1-56) compared to patients in good risk categories, for whom median OS was not reached (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The PLR was not associated with survival. Analyses of survival in the VS confirmed the NLR (P<0.0001), PNI (P<0.0001), PI (P<0.01), and mGPS (P<0.001) as predictors of survival. In a multivariable Cox regression model including all inflammatory indices and pre-established prognostic factors for severe Covid-19 including sex, age, comorbid burden, malignancy status, and receipt of anti-cancer therapy at Covid-19 diagnosis, the PNI was the only factor to emerge with a significant hazard ratio [HR] in both TS and VS analysis (TS HR 1.97, 95%CI 1.19-3.26, P=0.008;VS HR 2.48, 95%CI 1.47- 4.20, P=0.001). We conclude that systemic inflammation drives mortality from Covid-19 through hypoalbuminemia and lymphocytopenia as measured by the PNI and propose the PNI as the OnCovid Inflammatory Score (OIS) in this context.
ABSTRACT
Background: The long-term impact of COVID-19 in cancer patients (pts) is undefined. Methods: Among 2795 consecutive pts with COVID-19 and cancer registered to OnCovid between 01/2020 and 02/2021, we examined clinical outcomes of pts reassessed post COVID-19 recovery. Results: Among 1557 COVID-19 survivors, 234 (15%) reported sequelae including respiratory symptoms (49.6%), fatigue (41%) and cognitive/psychological dysfunction (4.3%). Persisting COVID-19 sequelae were more likely found in males (p=0.0407) aged ≥65 years (p=0.0489) with ≥2 comorbidities (p=0.0006) and positive smoking history (p=0.0004). Sequelae were associated with history of prior hospitalisation (p<0.0001), complicated disease (p<0.0001) and COVID-19 therapy (p=0.0002). With a median post-COVID-19 follow up of 128 days (95%CI 113-148), multivariable analysis of survival revealed COVID-19 sequelae to be associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.76, 95%CI 1.16-2.66) after adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, tumour characteristics, anticancer therapy and COVID-19 severity. Out of 473 patients who were on systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) at COVID-19 diagnosis;62 (13.1%) permanently discontinued therapy and 75 (15.8%) received SACT adjustments, respectively. Discontinuations were due to worsening performance status (45.1%), disease progression (16.1%) and residual organ disfunction (6.3%). SACT adjustments were pursued to avoid hospital attendance (40%), prevent immunosuppression (57.3%) or adverse events (20.3%). Multivariable analyses showed permanent discontinuation to be associated with an increased risk of death (HR 4.2, 95%CI: 1.62-10.7), whereas SACT adjustments did not adversely affect survival. Conclusions: Sequelae post-COVID-19 affect up to 15% of patients with cancer and adversely influence survival and oncological outcomes after recovery. SACT adjustments can be safely pursued to preserve oncological outcomes in patients who remain eligible to treatment. Clinical trial identification: NCT04393974. Legal entity responsible for the study: Imperial College London. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: A. Cortellini: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Astellas;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sun Pharma. D.J. Pinato: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: ViiV Healthcare;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bayer;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Eisai;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
ABSTRACT
Objective: NA Background: In the era of the COVID10 pandemic, increasing reports of ischemic strokes in patients who were positive with the infection have been noted. Although the pathophysiology of this is not completely understood, an association with a hypercoagulable state has been surmised with interaction with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and endothelial dysfunction. Design/Methods: NA Results: We present a 49-uear-old woman with hypertension, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and recent COVID19 infection who presented to the hospital for acute aphasia and right sided weakness. Neuroimaging revealed multiple scatter ischemic infarcts in left parasagittal cerebral hemispheres. Diagnostic workup revealed a large free-floating thrombus in the left common carotid artery. Coagulopathic workup was largely unremarkable. She was initiated on heparin drip to bridge to long term anticoagulation. Clinically, patient's symptoms improved drastically, and she left against medical advice during bridging process. Conclusions: There is growing literature of COVID19 contributing to a hypercoagulable state and increasing the risks of ischemic strokes even in the generally healthier younger population. In our patient, although she had other risk factors contributing to coagulopathy, we believe her acute development of her proximal common carotid artery thrombus was secondary to her recent COVID19 infection. This case contributes to growing body of literature regarding phenomenology and discussion on possible treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
Background: Despite high contagiousness and rapid spread, SARS-Cov-2 has led to heterogeneous outcomes across affected nations. Within Europe, the United Kingdom is the most severely affected country, with a death toll in excess of 100.000 as of February 2021. We aimed to compare the national impact of Covid19 on the risk of death in UK cancer patients versus those in continental Europe (EU). Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the OnCovid study database, a European registry of cancer patients consecutively diagnosed with Covid-19 in 27 centres from February 27 to September 10, 2020. We analysed case fatality rates and risk of death at 30 days and 6 months stratified by region of origin (UK versus EU). We compared patient characteristics at baseline, oncological and Covid-19 specific therapy across cohorts and tested these in multivariable Cox regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcome in UK versus EU patients. Results: Compared to EU patients (n = 924), UK patients (n = 468) were characterised by higher case fatality rates (40.38% versus 26.5%, p < 0.0001), higher risk of death at 30 days (hazard ratio, HR 1.64 [95%CI 1.36-1.99]) and 6 months after Covid-19 diagnosis (47.64% versus 33.33%, p < 0.0001, HR 1.59 [95%CI 1.33-1.88]). UK patients were more often males, of older age and more co-morbid than EU counterparts (p < 0.01). Receipt of anti-cancer therapy was lower in UK versus EU patients (p < 0.001). Despite equal proportions of complicated Covid-19, rates of intensive care admission and use of mechanical ventilation, UK cancer patients were less likely to receive anti-Covid-19 therapies including corticosteroids, anti-virals and interleukin-6 antagonists (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses adjusted for imbalanced prognostic factors confirmed the UK cohort to be characterised by worse risk of death at 30 days and 6 months, independent of patient's age, gender, tumour stage and status, number of co-morbidities, Covid-19 severity, receipt of anti-cancer and anti-Covid-19 therapy. Rates of permanent cessation of anti-cancer therapy post Covid-19 were similar in UK versus EU. Conclusions: UK cancer patients have been more severely impacted by the unfolding of the Covid-19 pandemic despite societal risk mitigation factors and rapid deferral of anti-cancer therapy. The increased frailty of UK cancer patients highlights high-risk groups that should be prioritised for anti-SARS-Cov-2 vaccination. Continued evaluation of long-term outcomes is warranted.
ABSTRACT
Background: The severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) is predicted by advancing age and co-morbidities. The relative contribution of cancer in influencing the course of COVID-19 is poorly understood. We designed the OnCOVID study to investigate natural history of COVID-19 disease in cancer patients. Methods: This retrospective, multi-center observational study conducted across 8 tertiary centers in Europe recruited cancer patients aged >/= 18 and diagnosed with COVID-19 between February 26th and April 1st, 2020. Descriptive statistics, univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess patient’s main characteristics and to evaluate the factors associated to COVID-19 related mortality. Results: We identified 204 patients from United Kingdom (n=97, 48%), Italy (n=56, 27%) and Spain (n=51, 25%). Most patients were male (n=127, 62%) had a diagnosis of solid malignancy (n=184, 91%) and 103 (51%) had non-metastatic disease. Mean (±SD) patient age was 69±13 years, and 161 (79%) had >/= 1 co-morbidity, most commonly hypertension (n=88, 43%) and diabetes (n=46, 23%). Commonest presenting symptoms were fever (n=136, 67%) and cough (n=119, 58%), beginning 3.8 (±4.5 SD) days before diagnosis. Most patients (n=141, 69%) had >/= 1 complication from COVID-19, including respiratory failure (n=128, 63%) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (n=49, 24%). In total, 36 patients (19%) patients were escalated to high-dependency or intensive care. At time of analysis, 59 patients had died (29%), 53 were discharged from hospital (26%) and 92 (45%) were in-hospital survivors. Mortality was higher in patients aged >/= 65 (36% versus 16%), in those with >/= 2 co-morbidities (40% versus 18%) and developing >/= 1 complication from COVID-19 (38% versus 4%, p=0.004). Multi-variable analyses confirmed age >/= 65 and >/= 2 co-morbidities to predict for patient mortality independent of tumor stage, active malignancy or anti-cancer therapy. Conclusions: In the early outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Europe co-morbid burden and advancing age predicted for adverse disease course in cancer patients. Risk stratification based on these factors should inform personalized oncological decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic. Legal entity responsible for the study: Imperial College London. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: D.J. Pinato: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, received lecture fees : ViiV Healthcare;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, received lecture fees : Bayer Healthcare;Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS;Advisory/Consultancy: Mina Therapeutics;EISAI;Roche;Astra Zeneca;Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD;BMS. A. Patriarca: Advisory/Consultancy: Takeda;Sanofi. G. Gaidano: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Janssen;Abbvie;Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca;Sunesys. J. Brunet: Advisory/Consultancy: MSD;AstraZeneca. J. Tabernero: Advisory/Consultancy: Array Biopharma;Astra Zeneca;Bayer;Beigene;Boehringer Ingelheim;Chugai;Genentech;GenMab;Halozyme;Inflection Biosciences Limited;Ipsen;Kura;Lilly;MSD;Menarini;Merck Serono;Merrimack;Merus;Molecular Partners;Novartis;Peptomics;Pfizer;Pharmacyclics;Rafael Pharmaceuticals;ProteoDesign SL;F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd;Sanofi;Servier;Seagen;Symphogen, Taiho, VCN Biosciences, Biocartis, Foundation Medicine, HalioDX SAS and Roche Diagnostics. A. Prat:Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Pfeizer;Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (self): Novartis;Roche;Honoraria (self): MSD Oncology;Lilly;Honoraria (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Daiichi Sankyo;Advisory/Consultancy: BMS;Amgen;NanoString Technologies. A. Gennari: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (self): Roche;Eli Lilly;EISAI;Advisory/Consultancy: Pierre Fabre;MSD;Novartis;Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Daiichi Sankyo;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Teva;Gentili;Pfizer;AstraZeneca;Celgene. All other authors have declared no onflicts of interest.